Re: UUID v7 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrey M. Borodin
Subject Re: UUID v7
Date
Msg-id 84D20D0F-B5FF-41CD-9F48-E282CE9FEC1D@yandex-team.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: UUID v7  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: UUID v7
List pgsql-hackers


On 10 Jul 2023, at 21:50, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> wrote:

I suggest we keep this thread to v7, which has pretty straightforward semantics for PostgreSQL.  v8 by definition has many possible implementations, so you're going to have to make pretty strong arguments that yours is the best and only one, if you are going to claim the gen_uuid_v8 function name.

Thanks Peter, I'll follow this course of action.

After discussion on GitHub with Sergey Prokhorenko [0] I understood that counter is optional, but useful part of UUID v7. It actually promotes sortability of data generated at high speed.
The standard does not specify how big counter should be. PFA patch with 16 bit counter. Maybe it worth doing 18bit counter - it will save us one byte of PRNG data. Currently we only take 2 bits out of the whole random byte.


Best regards, Andrey Borodin.


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: Re: Avoid undefined behavior with msvc compiler (src/include/port/pg_bitutils.h)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Avoid undefined behavior with msvc compiler (src/include/port/pg_bitutils.h)