Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Serge Rielau
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again
Date
Msg-id 84BEB3BF-D70E-4913-98ED-C92F59EFE7DE@rielau.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> On Jan 13, 2017, at 11:11 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> With Postgres we should to think much more about other PL - there is not only PL/pgSQL. So any what we create should
beavailable for any PL. Our PLpgSQL is based on total different technology design - so some benefits of sharing
compiledcode across databases has not too value in Postgres. 
Let me stress one last point:
MODULE’s are 100% orthogonal to PLpgSQL as implement by SFDC and also orthogonal to SQL PL as implemented by DB2.
Modules can (and do for us) contain C-functions of example.
Similarly when the community provides provides server side session variables I have no doubt they will integrate with
MODULE’swith very little work. 

It’s a DDL and name resolution game, predominantly

Cheers
Serge


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix a bug in how we generate partition constraints.
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix a bug in how we generate partitionconstraints.