On 2024/07/03 17:51, Hajime.Matsunaga@nttdata.com wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestions the other day.
> I have created a patch that incorporates your suggestions.
- <structname>pg_stat_database</structname></link>, in the output of
+ <structname>pg_stat_database</structname></link> and
+ <link linkend="monitoring-pg-stat-io-view">
+ <structname>pg_stat_io</structname></link>, in the output of
I'm not a native English speaker, but it seems more natural to use a comma instead of "and" before "pg_stat_io."
- of block read and write times.
+ of block read, block write, extend, and fsync times.
"block" before "fsync" doesn't seem necessary.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION