Unicode comment on Postgres vs Sql Server - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Swaminathan Saikumar
Subject Unicode comment on Postgres vs Sql Server
Date
Msg-id 82692d4a0803021150lb63ab9akd074e21e097deeb@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Unicode comment on Postgres vs Sql Server  (Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>)
Re: Unicode comment on Postgres vs Sql Server  (Tino Wildenhain <tino@wildenhain.de>)
Re: Unicode comment on Postgres vs Sql Server  ("Leif B. Kristensen" <leif@solumslekt.org>)
List pgsql-general
I am familiar with MS Sql Server & just started using Postgres.
For storing Unicode, Sql Server uses nvarchar/char for unicode, and uses char/varchar for ASCII.
Postgres has this encoding setting at the database level.

I am using UTF8 Unicode for most of my data, but there is some data that I know for sure will be ASCII. However, this is also stored as UTF8, using up more space.

At first sight, it looks like the the more granular level design is better. Any comments? If you agree, does it make sense to add this as a new datatype to Postgres?

Thanks

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Understanding ps -ef "command" column
Next
From: "Swaminathan Saikumar"
Date:
Subject: Design suggestion of multiple databases vs multiple schemas within the database