Re: Setting restrictedtoken in pg_regress - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Setting restrictedtoken in pg_regress
Date
Msg-id 822e6e3c-d904-fe09-98b6-22d6a08abdc8@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Setting restrictedtoken in pg_regress  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Setting restrictedtoken in pg_regress
List pgsql-hackers


On 2023-06-12 Mo 19:43, Nathan Bossart wrote:
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 08:29:19AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
I am actually a bit confused with the return value of
CreateRestrictedProcess() on failures in restricted_token.c.  Wouldn't
it be cleaner to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE rather than 0 in these
cases?
My suspicion is that this was chosen to align with CreateProcess and to
allow things like
	if (!CreateRestrictedProcess(...))


Probably, it's been a while. I doubt it's worth changing at this point, and we could just change pg_regress.c to use a boolean test like the above.


cheers


andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Aleksander Alekseev
Date:
Subject: Re: Pluggable toaster
Next
From: Aleksander Alekseev
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Slight improvement of worker_spi.c example