Re: Pluggable toaster - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Aleksander Alekseev
Subject Re: Pluggable toaster
Date
Msg-id CAJ7c6TNsOM6BW6uO9LxP5yjW9AbnWMX_Qae7nYE4Xw6F6mRtKA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Pluggable toaster  (Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Pluggable toaster  (Nikita Malakhov <hukutoc@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

> > I have a question for the community - why was this patch silently put to a "rejected" status?
> > Should there no be some kind of explanation?

I wouldn't say that it happened "silently" nor that the reason is so
mysterious [1].

[1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAM-w4HPjg7NwEWBtXn1empgAg3fqJHifHo_nhgqFWopiYaNxYg%40mail.gmail.com

-- 
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls?
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Setting restrictedtoken in pg_regress