Re: pg_receivewal documentation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jesper Pedersen
Subject Re: pg_receivewal documentation
Date
Msg-id 7eaf748c-3f40-c994-0eb3-7d87709588d0@redhat.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_receivewal documentation  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: pg_receivewal documentation
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 7/17/19 4:04 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> How about adding "or priority-based" after "quorum-based"?
> 
> I would be fine with that for the first part.  I am not sure of what a
> good formulation would be for the second part of the sentence.  Now it
> only refers to quorum, but with priority sets that does not apply.
> And I am not sure what "won't count towards the quorum" actually
> means.

Maybe something like the attached ?  Although it doesn't help we need to 
include <literal>on</literal> as well...

Best regards,
  Jesper



Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Change ereport level for QueuePartitionConstraintValidation
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: refactoring - share str2*int64 functions