Re: pg_receivewal documentation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: pg_receivewal documentation
Date
Msg-id 20190717080424.GB20614@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_receivewal documentation  (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>)
Responses Re: pg_receivewal documentation  (Jesper Pedersen <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 07:40:48AM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> I understand the concern, I'm just worried that too much accuracy may
> render the sentence hard to read.
>
> How about adding "or priority-based" after "quorum-based"?

I would be fine with that for the first part.  I am not sure of what a
good formulation would be for the second part of the sentence.  Now it
only refers to quorum, but with priority sets that does not apply.
And I am not sure what "won't count towards the quorum" actually
means.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Add parallelism and glibc dependent only options to reindexdb
Next
From: "Iwata, Aya"
Date:
Subject: RE: libpq debug log