Re: [HACKERS] 10beta1 sequence regression failure on sparc64 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] 10beta1 sequence regression failure on sparc64
Date
Msg-id 7a4d3b0f-78da-2a5b-7f3b-8b3509c1e183@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] 10beta1 sequence regression failure on sparc64  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] 10beta1 sequence regression failure on sparc64  (Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 5/18/17 10:11, Tom Lane wrote:
> Well, that's just wacko.  Somehow sequence.c's init_params() must
> be falling down on the job in selecting the right seqform->seqmin,
> but I'm darned if I see anything that's either wrong or potentially
> machine-dependent in that code.  It almost looks like it must be
> a compiler bug, though I hesitate to jump to that conclusion so
> quickly.  Peter, any ideas?

If we had a typo or something in that code, the build farm should have
caught it by now.

I would try compiling with lower -O and see what happens.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 10beta1 sequence regression failure on sparc64
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] different column orders in regression test database