Re: [HACKERS] 10beta1 sequence regression failure on sparc64 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christoph Berg
Subject Re: [HACKERS] 10beta1 sequence regression failure on sparc64
Date
Msg-id 20170518192924.jkrzevlencp3ggi6@msg.df7cb.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] 10beta1 sequence regression failure on sparc64  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] 10beta1 sequence regression failure on sparc64  (Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Re: Peter Eisentraut 2017-05-18 <7a4d3b0f-78da-2a5b-7f3b-8b3509c1e183@2ndquadrant.com>
> If we had a typo or something in that code, the build farm should have
> caught it by now.
> 
> I would try compiling with lower -O and see what happens.

Trying -O0 now.

Re: Andres Freund 2017-05-18 <20170518184811.7c44jcvwjvnzczho@alap3.anarazel.de>
> Weird.  Christoph, IIRC you can help gaining access to a porter machine
> to reproduce this?

I'll let the build run over night (the machine has 32 cores but is
dead slow) and see what I can arrange tomorrow. (Peter will already
have access, it's notker.debian.net.)

Christoph



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 10beta1/m68k: static assertion failed: "MAXALIGN toosmall to fit int32"
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] different column orders in regression test database