On 20 Jun 2005, at 18:46, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Alex,
>
>
>
>> Hi, i'm trying to optimise our autovacuum configuration so that it
>> vacuums / analyzes some of our larger tables better. It has been set
>> to the default settings for quite some time. We never delete
>> anything (well not often, and not much) from the tables, so I am not
>> so worried about the VACUUM status, but I am wary of XID wraparound
>> nuking us at some point if we don't sort vacuuming out so we VACUUM
>> at least once every year ;)
>>
>>
>
> I personally don't use autovaccuum on very large databases. For DW,
> vacuuming is far better tied to ETL operations or a clock schedule of
> downtime.
>
Downtime is something I'd rather avoid if possible. Do you think we
will need to run VACUUM FULL occasionally? I'd rather not lock tables
up unless I cant avoid it. We can probably squeeze an automated
vacuum tied to our data inserters every now and then though.
> XID wraparound may be further away than you think. Try checking
> pg_controldata, which will give you the current XID, and you can
> calculate
> how long you are away from wraparound. I just tested a 200G data
> warehouse
> and figured out that we are 800 months away from wraparound,
> despite hourly
> ETL.
>
Is this an 8.0 thing? I don't have a pg_controldata from what I can
see. Thats nice to hear though.
>
>
>
>> However not running ANALYZE for such huge
>> periods of time is probably impacting the statistics accuracy
>> somewhat, and I have seen some unusually slow queries at times.
>> Anyway, does anyone think we might benefit from a more aggressive
>> autovacuum configuration?
>>
>>
>
> Hmmm, good point, you could use autovacuum for ANALYZE only. Just
> set the
> VACUUM settings preposterously high (like 10x) so it never runs.
> Then it'll
> run ANALYZE only. I generally threshold 200, multiple 0.1x for
> analyze;
> that is, re-analyze after 200+10% of rows have changed.
>
I will try those settings out, that sounds good to me though.
> --
> Josh Berkus
> Aglio Database Solutions
> San Francisco
>
>
>
