Re: autovacuum suggestions for 500,000,000+ row tables? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: autovacuum suggestions for 500,000,000+ row tables?
Date
Msg-id 200506211013.40993.josh@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: autovacuum suggestions for 500,000,000+ row tables?  (Alex Stapleton <alexs@advfn.com>)
Responses Re: autovacuum suggestions for 500,000,000+ row tables?  (Alex Stapleton <alexs@advfn.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Alex,

> Downtime is something I'd rather avoid if possible. Do you think we
> will need to run VACUUM FULL occasionally? I'd rather not lock tables
> up unless I cant avoid it. We can probably squeeze an automated
> vacuum tied to our data inserters every now and then though.

As long as your update/deletes are less than 10% of the table for all time,
you should never have to vacuum, pending XID wraparound.

> Is this an 8.0 thing? I don't have a pg_controldata from what I can
> see. Thats nice to hear though.

'fraid so, yes.

--
--Josh

Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: PFC
Date:
Subject: Re: Do Views execute underlying query everytime ??
Next
From: Matthew Nuzum
Date:
Subject: Re: Do Views execute underlying query everytime ??