Re: Postgresql replication - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Welty, Richard
Subject Re: Postgresql replication
Date
Msg-id 7A8D99D6C4AE9347886B31F047F26BD6045C5F@ex2k.bankofamerica.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Postgresql replication  (Carlos Henrique Reimer <carlosreimer@yahoo.com.br>)
List pgsql-general
Jeff Davis writes:

>The disadvantages:

one more: if you actually have m tables and n servers, you have
m x n tables in reality, which is pretty miserable scaling behavior.
i should think that rules, triggers, and embedded procedures would
explode in complexity rather rapidly.

i know i wouldn't want to administer one of these if there were a lot
of sites.

>I hope this is helpful. Let me know if there's some reason my plan won't
>work.

look at the solution in pgreplicator. site ids are embedded in the
id columns in the tables, so there only m tables, and a bit less insanity.

richard
  (dropping out of this conversation, i'm unsubscribing while on vacation)

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Chris Guo"
Date:
Subject: Re: Start up script for Fedora Core 3
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Problem finding libpg.3.dylib on macos X in plperlu procedure