[BUG #17888] Incorrect memory access in gist__int_ops for an input array with many elements - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ankit Kumar Pandey
Subject [BUG #17888] Incorrect memory access in gist__int_ops for an input array with many elements
Date
Msg-id 796b65c3-57b7-bddf-b0d5-a8afafb8b627@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [BUG #17888] Incorrect memory access in gist__int_ops for an input array with many elements  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

I was looking at this issue: 
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/17888-f72930e6b5ce8c14%40postgresql.org

pfree call on contrib/intarray/_int_gist.c:345

```

     if (in != (ArrayType *) DatumGetPointer(entry->key))
         pfree(in);

```

leads to BogusFree function call and server crash.

This is when we use array size of 1001.

If we increase array size to 3001, we get index size error,

NOTICE:  input array is too big (199 maximum allowed, 3001 current), use 
gist__intbig_ops opclass instead
ERROR:  index row requires 12040 bytes, maximum size is 8191

When array size is 1001 is concerned, we raise elog about input array is 
too big, multiple of times. Wouldn't it make more sense to error out 
instead of proceeding further and getting bogus pointer errors messages 
(as we do when size is 3001)?

Changing elog to ereport makes behavior consistent (between array size 
of 1001 vs 3001), so I have

attached a patch for that.

It errors out like this:

ERROR:  input array is too big (199 maximum allowed, 1001 current), use 
gist__intbig_ops opclass instead

This is same error which was raised as notice earlier.

Let me know if it makes sense.


Also, comments on BogusFree mentions `As a possible
aid in debugging, we report the header word along with the pointer
address`. How can we interpret useful debugging information from this?

`pfree called with invalid pointer 0x7ff1706d0030 (header 
0x4fc8000100000000)`


Regards,

Ankit

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Melanie Plageman
Date:
Subject: Re: ERROR messages in VACUUM's PARALLEL option
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: When to drop src/tools/msvc support