On 15.11.22 11:31, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 14.11.22 08:25, John Naylor wrote:
>> Regarding the patch, it looks good overall. My only suggestion would
>> be to add a regression test for just below and just above overflow, at
>> least for int2.
>
> ok
This was a valuable suggestion, because this found some breakage. In
particular, the handling of grammar-level literals that overflow to
"Float" was not correct. (The radix prefix was simply stripped and
forgotten.) So I added a bunch more tests for this. Here is a new patch.
