Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table
Date
Msg-id 7861b08a-4c59-8440-4fa9-7771de22c927@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table
List pgsql-hackers
On 1/11/18 13:52, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> The delta patch turned out to have at least one stupid bug, and a few
> non-stupid bugs.  Here's an updated version that should behave
> correctly, and addresses all reported problems.

It seems that CompareIndexInfo() still doesn't compare indexes' operator
classes and collations.

Also, some new test cases for pg_dump would be nice.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data
Next
From: Marina Polyakova
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP Patch: Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors