Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table
Date
Msg-id 20180111185207.lrde2jlvvhsbyntd@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table
Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table
List pgsql-hackers
The delta patch turned out to have at least one stupid bug, and a few
non-stupid bugs.  Here's an updated version that should behave
correctly, and addresses all reported problems.

(One minor issue Jaime found and I hadn't listed is that alter_index and
alter_table SGML pages said "ATTACH" instead of "ATTACH PARTITION".
Fixed those too for this version.)

I'll set this as Ready for Committer now.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: IndexTupleDSize macro seems redundant
Next
From: Christian Rossow
Date:
Subject: bytea bitwise logical operations implementation (xor / and / or /not)