On Sep 13, 2006, at 2:46 PM, Strong, David wrote:
> We have some results for you. We left the buffer partition locks at
> 128
> as this did not seem to be a concern and we're still using 25 backend
> processes. We ran tests for 4, 8 and 16 lock partitions.
Isn't having more lock partitions than buffer partitions pointless?
--
Jim Nasby jim@nasby.net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
