Re: Lock partitions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Lock partitions
Date
Msg-id 16849.1158182313@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Lock partitions  (Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net> writes:
> Isn't having more lock partitions than buffer partitions pointless?

AFAIK they're pretty orthogonal.  It's true though that a typical
transaction doesn't hold all that many locks, which is why I don't
see a need for a large number of lock partitions.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: CVS commit messages and backpatching
Next
From: Tom Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta