Re: [HACKERS] New TODO item - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] New TODO item
Date
Msg-id 7626.929717076@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] New TODO item  (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:
> I'm not recalling why we would want to handle bare relation names in
> an expression, ...
> Would you prefer that we do nothing until I have a chance to research
> this some more, or is someone going to dive in?

Research away.  As far as I can see, this isn't affecting processing of
any valid queries; it's just a matter of less-than-desirable response
to an invalid one.  So I think we can take our time about fixing it.
I know I've got other things to work on...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig