Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com> writes:
> 2010/8/14 Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>:
>> 2010/8/10 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
>>> Eventually it might be nice to have some sort of way to specify the
>>> estimate to use for any aggregate function --- but for a near-term
>>> fix maybe we should just hard-wire a special case for array_agg in
>>> count_agg_clauses_walker().
> So, is it better to generalize as it adds ALLOCSET_DEFAULT_INITSIZE if
> the transtype is internal, rather than specifying individual function
> OID as the patch stands?
Seems like a good idea ... it's ugly, but it seems much less likely to
need maintenance.
regards, tom lane
