Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Recognize functional dependency on primary keys. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Recognize functional dependency on primary keys.
Date
Msg-id 7305.1281792213@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Recognize functional dependency on primary keys.  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Recognize functional dependency on primary keys.  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Recognize functional dependency on primary keys.  (Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> No doubt, but the TODO entry you removed is still 100% accurately
>> worded, and what's more the archive entry it links to clearly describes
>> exactly the point at issue, namely that grouping by a PK *isn't*
>> indeterminate.  You were wrong to remove it.

> OK, I put it back, but I still feel we might not need it anymore.

Even if you're willing to believe that the questions will stop once
we have this feature, that won't happen for more than a year.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP partial replication patch
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #5608: array_agg() consumes too much memory