Re: pg 10.1 missing libpq in postgresql-devel - Mailing list pgsql-general
From | support-tiger |
---|---|
Subject | Re: pg 10.1 missing libpq in postgresql-devel |
Date | |
Msg-id | 74ca966f-b480-ec3a-bfb7-98456b00628b@tigernassau.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: pg 10.1 missing libpq in postgresql-devel (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>) |
Responses |
Re: pg 10.1 missing libpq in postgresql-devel
(Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
|
List | pgsql-general |
On 01/27/2018 06:43 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote: > On 01/27/2018 04:34 PM, support-tiger wrote: >> sorry for delay but ran some tests on older version pg gem - still fails > > With what error message? > > What Ruby gem? > >> >> it fails on building the config file with simply missing libpq-fe.h, >> cannot find libpq-fe.h > > Well it is there: > > rpm -qlp postgresql10-devel-10.1-1PGDG.f27.x86_64.rpm | grep libpq-fe.h > warning: postgresql10-devel-10.1-1PGDG.f27.x86_64.rpm: Header V4 > DSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 442df0f8: NOKEY > /usr/pgsql-10/include/libpq-fe.h > >> >> I suspect it is a problem with using the pgdg repository and that >> postgresql get "10" added to them ie postgresql10-devel and maybe the >> gem code does not recognize that. Since vers 10 is not breaking it >> does not make sense (i guess fedora) to rename vers 10 with the "10" >> - maybe they just love the python 2 / 3 fiasco and want to extend it >> to postgresql. > > Previous versions used version numbering also: > > https://yum.postgresql.org/9.6/fedora/fedora-26-x86_64/ > > postgresql96-devel-9.6.6-1PGDG.f26.x86_64.rpm > > My guess it that the config script for the gem is not taking into > account that Postgres changed from a three part versioning system > X.Y.z to a two part system X.y(where lower case is minor version) from > 9.6.0 to 10.1. could be, cannot find the config file in the repository - specifies to use a pg-config file to build the gem but no trace of such a config file thks anyway for your help. had emailed the pg gem leads but no response and github issues are blocked (duh) - can't depend on this -will just make a faster transition to Crystal - the pg shard in Crystal loaded okay on Fedora with the 10.1 > >> >> >> >> >> On 01/25/2018 03:59 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote: >>> On 01/25/2018 12:20 PM, support-tiger wrote: >>>> running postgresql 10.1 on Fedora 27. Cannot install ruby pg gem >>>> due to missing libpq-fe.h file. This is usually found in >>>> postgresql-devel but >>> >>> What was the error message returned when you tried to install >>> originally? >>> >>>> it is not in fedora 27 postgresql10-devel. If install >>>> postgresql-devel (9.6) the gem installs without problem but afraid >>>> this will interfere with 10.1 How can we install the necessary >>>> libpq-fe.h ? thks >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > > -- Support Dept Tiger Nassau, Inc. www.tigernassau.com 406-624-9310
pgsql-general by date: