Unless I missed something and am wrong, right now it's PostgreSQL.
If we want to change it great, but lets at least be consistent.
Gavin
On Jul 22, 2006, at 7:39 PM, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>> In keeping with some of the other recent discussions of common
>> confusions, if you were to redo it in mixed case, with the text
>> portion reading "PostgresQL", rather than "POSTGRESQL", that would be
>> subtly better. (People commonly make the mistake of dropping off
>> SQL,
>> and characterizing it as "Postgre"...)
>
> Argh. And PostgresQL is better? Then people will ask what QL stands
> for.
> Just make it simply say "Postgres" or "POSTGRES" and everyone wins. :)
>
> - --
> Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
> PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200607222236
> http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iD8DBQFEwuDmvJuQZxSWSsgRAvlUAJ9r00iXbPi2TDGWsGkad9JDBhrKjACfYuNo
> pDu+YfHV7rVZPAv31LWEOwk=
> =Lw6E
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that
> your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
