Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [PATCH] Native spinlock support on RISC-V - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [PATCH] Native spinlock support on RISC-V
Date
Msg-id 73691.1628870608@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Native spinlock support on RISC-V  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Native spinlock support on RISC-V
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2021-08-13 11:09:04 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Marek Szuba <marecki@gentoo.org> writes:
>>> Tested against PostgreSQL 13.3 on a physical rv64gc system (BeagleV
>>> Starlight beta board) - builds and installs fine, all tests pass.

> Should we backpatch this? It's not like we're going to break existing
> risc-v systems by enabling spinlock support...

Yeah, why not?  If you were building with --disable-spinlocks before,
this shouldn't change anything for you.

(I haven't actually looked at the patch, mind you, but in principle
it shouldn't break anything that worked before.)

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: pgstat: Bring up pgstat in BaseInit() to fix uninitialized use o
Next
From: Ranier Vilela
Date:
Subject: Re: Multiple Postgres process are running in background