Re: [PATCH] Native spinlock support on RISC-V - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [PATCH] Native spinlock support on RISC-V
Date
Msg-id 20210813153001.xtuvpam2dtysrsd3@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Native spinlock support on RISC-V  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Native spinlock support on RISC-V  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2021-08-13 11:09:04 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Marek Szuba <marecki@gentoo.org> writes:
> > Tested against PostgreSQL 13.3 on a physical rv64gc system (BeagleV
> > Starlight beta board) - builds and installs fine, all tests pass.

Seems like a good idea to me.

> Cool ... I had hoped to acquire one of those myself, but I didn't
> make the cut.

Should we backpatch this? It's not like we're going to break existing
risc-v systems by enabling spinlock support...

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Native spinlock support on RISC-V
Next
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: Multiple Postgres process are running in background