HAVE_WORKING_LINK still needed? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject HAVE_WORKING_LINK still needed?
Date
Msg-id 72fff73f-dc9c-4ef4-83e8-d2e60c98df48@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: HAVE_WORKING_LINK still needed?
Re: HAVE_WORKING_LINK still needed?
Re: HAVE_WORKING_LINK still needed?
List pgsql-hackers
I came across the HAVE_WORKING_LINK define in pg_config_manual.h. 
AFAICT, hard links are supported on Windows and Cygwin in the OS 
versions that we support, and pg_upgrade already contains the required 
shim.  It seems to me we could normalize and simplify that, as in the 
attached patches.  (Perhaps rename durable_link_or_rename() then.)  I 
successfully tested on MSVC, MinGW, and Cygwin.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Add PostgreSQL home page to --help output
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: more ALTER .. DEPENDS ON EXTENSION fixes