Re: Big 7.1 open items - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Big 7.1 open items
Date
Msg-id 7181.961167635@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Big 7.1 open items  (JanWieck@t-online.de (Jan Wieck))
Responses Re: Big 7.1 open items
RE: Big 7.1 open items
Re: Big 7.1 open items
List pgsql-hackers
JanWieck@t-online.de (Jan Wieck) writes:
>     There are also disadvantages.

>         You can run out of space even if there  are  plenty  GB's
>         free  on  your  disks.   You  have  to create tablespaces
>         explicitly.

Not to mention the reverse: if I read this right, you have to suck
up your GB's long in advance of actually needing them.  That's OK
for a machine that's dedicated to Oracle ... not so OK for smaller
installations, playpens, etc.

I'm not convinced that there's anything fundamentally wrong with
doing storage allocation in Unix files the way we have been.

(At least not when we're sitting atop a well-done filesystem,
which may leave the Linux folk out in the cold ;-).)
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: Changes to functions and triggers
Next
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: Big 7.1 open items