Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

16 June 2000

• 00:25   Allow nested transactions Haroldo Stenger
• 00:58   Re: Big 7.1 open items Tom Lane
• 01:05   Re: 7.0.2 cuts off attribute name Tom Lane
• 01:25   Re: Big 7.1 open items Bruce Momjian
• 01:38   Re: [unixODBC-DEV] - info on unixODBC/Postgres driver port to IRIX 6.5.7 64bit Nick Gorham
• 01:41   Re: Mandrake RPMS, was "Building PostgreSQL 7.0.1 documentation" Jan Dittberner
• 01:41   Mandrake RPMS, was "Building PostgreSQL 7.0.1 documentation" Jan Dittberner
• 01:41   RE: Big 7.1 open items Hiroshi Inoue
• 02:19   RE: Big 7.1 open items Hiroshi Inoue
• 02:36   Re: Big 7.1 open items Tom Lane
• 02:44   Re: Big 7.1 open items Tom Lane
• 02:56   RE: Big 7.1 open items Hiroshi Inoue
• 03:02   Re: postgresql.org ftp troubles? The Hermit Hacker
• 04:34   RE: Big 7.1 open items Hiroshi Inoue
• 04:41   Re: Big 7.1 open items Chris Bitmead
• 04:55   Re: Big 7.1 open items Tom Lane
• 05:38   Re: the contrib tree clean up Tom Lane
• 06:01   RE: Big 7.1 open items Hiroshi Inoue
• 06:16   Re: Shared library interdependencies Tom Lane
• 06:35   Re: Big 7.1 open items Tom Lane
• 11:43   Changes to functions and triggers darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
• 12:14   Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes Ryan Kirkpatrick
• 13:00   Re: Re: Big 7.1 open items Tatsuo Ishii
• 13:37   Re: Re: Big 7.1 open items Thomas Lockhart
• 13:44   Re: Changes to functions and triggers Tom Lane
• 13:45   Re: Big 7.1 open items JanWieck@t-online.de (Jan Wieck)
• 13:46   Re: Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes Tom Lane
• 13:50   Re: Changes to functions and triggers Thomas Lockhart
• 14:00   Re: Big 7.1 open items Tom Lane
• 14:16   Re: Big 7.1 open items Thomas Lockhart
• 14:48   Re: Big 7.1 open items Tom Lane
• 15:10   ERROR: cannot find attribute 1 of relation pg_temp.13465.1 Kristofer Munn
• 15:27   create user and transactions Thomas Lockhart
• 15:31   Re: Big 7.1 open items Thomas Lockhart
• 15:36   Re: Big 7.1 open items Bruce Momjian
• 15:52   Re: create user and transactions Tom Lane
• 15:53   Re: Big 7.1 open items The Hermit Hacker
• 15:53   Re: Big 7.1 open items The Hermit Hacker
• 15:55   Re: Big 7.1 open items Tom Lane
• 16:00   Re: AW: Big 7.1 open items The Hermit Hacker
• 16:08   Re: Big 7.1 open items Tom Lane
• 16:32   planner question re index vs seqscan Ed Loehr
• 16:51   OK, OK, Hiroshi's right: use a seperately-generated filename Tom Lane
• 16:57   Why does cluster need the indexname? G. Anthony Reina
• 17:23   Re: planner question re index vs seqscan Jeff Hoffmann
• 17:31   Re: planner question re index vs seqscan Tom Lane
• 17:40   Re: Big 7.1 open items Don Baccus
• 17:40   Re: Big 7.1 open items Don Baccus
• 17:42   Re: planner question re index vs seqscan Tom Lane
• 18:01   Re: Big 7.1 open items Tom Lane
• 18:08   Re: Big 7.1 open items Bruce Momjian
• 18:08   Re: Why does cluster need the indexname? Bruce Momjian
• 18:18   Re: Why does cluster need the indexname? Tom Lane
• 18:19   Re: planner question re index vs seqscan Ed Loehr
• 18:43   Re: Big 7.1 open items Don Baccus
• 18:48   Re: Big 7.1 open items Ross J. Reedstrom
• 19:20   Re: Why does cluster need the indexname? G. Anthony Reina
• 20:02   Re: Big 7.1 open items Kaare Rasmussen
• 20:07   Re: Big 7.1 open items Ross J. Reedstrom
• 21:28   Re: Changes to functions and triggers darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
• 21:48   Re: planner question re index vs seqscan Tom Lane
• 22:10   RE: Big 7.1 open items Hiroshi Inoue
• 22:18   Re: Big 7.1 open items Tom Lane
• 22:31   Re: Big 7.1 open items Tom Lane
• 22:45   Re: Bug with views and defaults Tom Lane
• 23:08   Re: Bug with views and defaults Bruce Momjian
• 23:10   Re: Big 7.1 open items Bruce Momjian
• 23:40   Re: Big 7.1 open items Chris Bitmead
• 23:41   Re: Mandrake RPMS, was "Building PostgreSQL 7.0.1 documentation" Lamar Owen
• 23:50   Re: OK, OK, Hiroshi's right: use a seperately-generated filename Chris Bitmead