Re: General purpose hashing func in pgbench - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ildar Musin
Subject Re: General purpose hashing func in pgbench
Date
Msg-id 71204068-107a-b933-c001-b1ff7aceba78@postgrespro.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: General purpose hashing func in pgbench  (Ildar Musin <i.musin@postgrespro.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
09/01/2018 19:22, Ildar Musin пишет:
> Hello Fabien,
>
>
> 25/12/2017 19:17, Fabien COELHO пишет:
>>>> However, the key can be used if controlled so that different values do
>>>> not have the same randomization in different part of the script, so as
>>>> to avoid using the same patterns for different things if not desirable.
>>> Original murmur algorithm accepts seed as a parameter, which can be used
>>> for this purpose. I used value itself as a seed in the patch, but I can
>>> turn it into a function argument.
>> Hmmm. Possibly. However it needs a default, something like
>>
>>   x = hash(v[, key])
>>
>> with key some pseudo-random value?
>>
> Sorry for a long delay. I've added hash() function which is just an
> alias for murmur2. I've also utilized variable arguments feature from
> least()/greates() functions to make optional seed parameter, but I
> consider this as a hack. Should we probably add some infrastructure for
> optional arguments? Docs and tests are on their way.
>
> Thanks!
>
I forgot to attach couple of fresh charts that show how distribution
changes with respect to seed.

-- 
Ildar Musin
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company 


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ildar Musin
Date:
Subject: Re: General purpose hashing func in pgbench
Next
From: Antonin Houska
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Secondary index access optimizations