Re: The postgres database -- necessary? If so, how to cleanse? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From René Fournier
Subject Re: The postgres database -- necessary? If so, how to cleanse?
Date
Msg-id 711041EB-0DDC-469C-AFC4-BB399BD01741@renefournier.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: The postgres database -- necessary? If so, how to cleanse?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: The postgres database -- necessary? If so, how to cleanse?  (Raymond O'Donnell <rod@iol.ie>)
List pgsql-general
OK, great. Thank. And when I recreate it, should I do so from a template, or just CREATE DATABASE postgres ?

On 2011-10-26, at 4:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

> =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Fournier?= <m5@renefournier.com> writes:
>> I accidentally imported lots of data into the postgres database via something like:
>> psql -U postgres -q -f super_massive_database_dump.sql
>
>> Now, although I've manually dropped all the tables -- and \d+ shows
>> nothing -- there are still various views, functions, etc that must
>> account for a lot of disk space. From \l+, I see that postgres still
>> occupies 65GB.
>
> [ raised eyebrow ... ]  It's pretty hard to conceive of system catalogs
> occupying 65GB.  You might want to look into where that number is coming
> from.  (Large objects maybe?)
>
>> So my question is, what's the easiest way to reclaim
>> that space? Can I drop postgres and just recreate it?
>
> Yeah, if you want.
>
>             regards, tom lane
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: The postgres database -- necessary? If so, how to cleanse?
Next
From: Raymond O'Donnell
Date:
Subject: Re: The postgres database -- necessary? If so, how to cleanse?