Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v11 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v11
Date
Msg-id 6e253566-1757-9c86-bfe1-d47a4c493c71@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v11  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 3/9/18 15:42, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> The default of jit_above_cost = 500000 seems pretty good.  I constructed
> a query that cost about 450000 where the run time with and without JIT
> were about even.  This is obviously very limited testing, but it's a
> good start.

Actually, the default in your latest code is 100000, which per my
analysis would be too low.  Did you arrive at that setting based on testing?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v11
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Bogus use of canonicalize_qual