Re: [HACKERS] win32 performance - fsync question - Mailing list pgsql-hackers-win32

From Merlin Moncure
Subject Re: [HACKERS] win32 performance - fsync question
Date
Msg-id 6EE64EF3AB31D5448D0007DD34EEB3412A7633@Herge.rcsinc.local
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-hackers-win32
> Reading your mails about the pull-the-plug tests, I see that at least
with
> write caching enabled, fsync is more secure on win32 than open_sync.
I.e.
> one should disable write caching for use with open_sync. Also
open_sync
> seems to perform much better. All that information would be nice to
have
> in
> the docs.

There are very little platform specific notes in the regular
documentation.  Tbe best sync settings for performance and safety tend
to differ on various platforms.

There is a win32 faq; in the current state of things win32 specific
notes belongs there.  I think a reasonable case could be made to move
various platform specific things into the regular documentation in a
special section.

Merlin


pgsql-hackers-win32 by date:

Previous
From: "Merlin Moncure"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] win32 performance - fsync question
Next
From: Joerg Hessdoerfer
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail