Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit kapila
Subject Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol
Date
Msg-id 6C0B27F7206C9E4CA54AE035729E9C382853263C@szxeml509-mbs
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol  (Amit kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com>)
Responses Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tuesday, September 11, 2012 7:07 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
On Monday, September 10, 2012 8:20 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
On Sunday, September 09, 2012 1:37 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
On Friday, September 07, 2012 11:19 PM Tom Lane wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> writes:
>>>> Would socketpair(2) be simpler?



>>>>I've not done anything yet about the potential security issues
>>>>associated with untrusted libpq connection strings.  I think this
>>>is still at the proof-of-concept stage; in particular, it's probably
>>> time to see if we can make it work on Windows before we worry more
>>>about that.

>> I have started working on this patch to make it work on Windows. The 3
main things to make it work are:

>The patch which contains Windows implementation as well is attached with this mail. It contains changes related to
following
>1. waitpid
>2. socketpair
>3. fork-exec

>The following is still left:
> 1. Error handling in all paths

The modified version 2 contains error handling in all paths.

With Regards,
Amit Kapila
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Cause of recent buildfarm failures on hamerkop
Next
From: Amit kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #7534: walreceiver takes long time to detect n/w breakdown