On Thursday, September 13, 2012 10:57 PM Fujii Masao
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 12, 2012 10:15 PM Fujii Masao
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:54 PM, <amit.kapila@huawei.com> wrote:
>>>> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>>>
>>>> Bug reference: 7534
>>>> Logged by: Amit Kapila
>>>> Email address: amit.kapila@huawei.com
>>>> PostgreSQL version: 9.2.0
>>>> Operating system: Suse 10
>>>> Description:
>>
>>>> 1. Both master and standby machine are connected normally,
>>>> 2. then you use the command: ifconfig ip down; make the network card of
>>>> master and standby down,
>>
>>>> Observation
>>>> master can detect connect abnormal, but the standby can't detect connect
>>>> abnormal and show a connected channel long time.
>
>
>> I would like to implement such feature for walreceiver, but there is one
>> confusion that whether to use
>> same configuration parameter(replication_timeout) for walrecevier as for
>> master or introduce a new
>> configuration parameter (receiver_replication_timeout).
>I like the latter. I believe some users want to set the different
>timeout values,
>for example, in the case where the master and standby servers are placed in
>the same room, but cascaded standby is placed in other continent.
Thank you for your suggestion. I have implemented as per your suggestion to have separate timeout parameter for
walreceiver.
The main changes are:
1. Introduce a new configuration parameter wal_receiver_replication_timeout for walreceiver.
2. In function WalReceiverMain(), check if there is no communication till wal_receiver_replication_timeout, exit the
walreceiver.
This is same as walsender functionality.
As this is a feature, So I am uploading the attached patch in coming CommitFest.
Suggestions/Comments?
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
