> >> which looks like they figured out that they needed to check for
> >> MicroSoft C explicitly. I have no idea why they do not define
> >> __STDC__ however.
>
> > Can we just define __STDC__ when compiling that file (or
> rather, when
> > compiling any bison-generated output file)? Or is that
> likely to cause
> > *other* issues?
>
> That seems pretty risky. Better to use the /Za switch or
> whatever it was to get the compiler to assert it for itself.
> We have precedent for adding
> yes-we'd-like-a-standard-compiler-please switches where
> necessary, for instance adding -Ae to CFLAGS for HP's compiler.
Unfortunatly, that breaks things so bad it's not even funny. For a file
as simple as src/port/win32error.c I get hundreds of errors - many in
the win32 header files. Seems you ar eont allowed to pull in the win32
API headers without that flag - just the basic ANSI ones. So that' sjust
not going to fly.
//Magnus
