Re: response time when querying via JDBC and via psql differs - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Markus Bertheau
Subject Re: response time when querying via JDBC and via psql differs
Date
Msg-id 684362e10802250310m48c45cb3lad3e70312ef4b3b6@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to response time when querying via JDBC and via psql differs  ("Pavel Rotek" <pavel.rotek@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: response time when querying via JDBC and via psql differs
List pgsql-performance
2008/2/25, Pavel Rotek <pavel.rotek@gmail.com>:
>   I have created functional index table(lower(href) varchar_pattern_ops)
> because of lower case "like" searching. When i ask the database directly
> from psql, it returns result in 0,5 ms, but when i put the same command via
> jdbc driver, it returns in 10 000 ms. Where can be the problem?? Any problem
> with PostgreSQL tuning??

Most likely the problem is that the JDBC driver uses prepared statements, in
which the query is planned withouth the concrete argument value. For like only
patterns that don't start with % or _ can use the index. Without the argument
value PostgreSQL can't tell whether that is the case, so it takes the safe
route and chooses a sequential scan.

to solve this particular problem, you have to convince jdbc to not use a
prepared statement for this particular query.

Markus

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Pavel Rotek"
Date:
Subject: response time when querying via JDBC and via psql differs
Next
From: Matthew
Date:
Subject: Re: CORRECTION to msg 'loading same instance of dump to two different servers simultaneously'