On Oct 1, 2008, at 2:03 PM, Sam Mason wrote:
> I know you said detecting memory errors wasn't being attempted, but
> bad memory accounts for a reasonable number of reports of database
> corruption on -general so I was wondering if moving the checks around
> could catch some of these.
Down the road, I would also like to have a sanity check for data
modification that occur while the data is in a buffer, to guard
against memory or CPU errors. But the huge issue there is how to do
it without killing performance. Because there's no obvious solution
to that, I don't want to try and get it in for 8.4.
--
Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect decibel@decibel.org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
