Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery
Date
Msg-id 1222985488.4445.1625.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 18:28 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> > Version 7
> 
> After reading this for awhile, I realized that there is a rather
> fundamental problem with it: it switches into "consistent recovery"
> mode as soon as it's read WAL beyond ControlFile->minRecoveryPoint.

Just seen this patch has been bounced into November CommitFest, even
though the new patch fixes all of the concerns raised.

I'm concerned that this is going to make the final Hot Standby patch
fairly large, which will make it even harder to review, test and
generally get accepted.

What's the best way to make this easier for you/others to review?

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Dawid Kuroczko"
Date:
Subject: Re: Block-level CRC checks
Next
From: Decibel!
Date:
Subject: Re: Block-level CRC checks