Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery
Date
Msg-id 48E5544B.5050103@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery
List pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 18:28 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>   
>> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
>>     
>>> Version 7
>>>       
>> After reading this for awhile, I realized that there is a rather
>> fundamental problem with it: it switches into "consistent recovery"
>> mode as soon as it's read WAL beyond ControlFile->minRecoveryPoint.
>>     
>
> Just seen this patch has been bounced into November CommitFest, even
> though the new patch fixes all of the concerns raised.
>
> I'm concerned that this is going to make the final Hot Standby patch
> fairly large, which will make it even harder to review, test and
> generally get accepted.
>
> What's the best way to make this easier for you/others to review?
>
>   

The fact that it's been put on the November list doesn't mean it can't 
be reviewed and committed before then.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Decibel!
Date:
Subject: Re: Block-level CRC checks
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: parallel restore test results