Re: Doc bug - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gurjeet Singh
Subject Re: Doc bug
Date
Msg-id 65937bea0612301932o52ec8b8oa91c0a450035573f@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Doc bug  ("Gurjeet Singh" <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Doc bug  ("Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Jim,

    The code has been fixed by Bruce in response to my bug#2851 (http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2006-12/msg00191.php).

BTW, I don't know how to make sure that the effect of a doc patch looks fine in a browser. I mean, how to view the doc/src/sgml/*.sgml in a browser, nicely formatted as we see on our website!

I wish PostgreSQL community a very Happy New Year... Go ahead and give closed-source a tough time :)

--
gurjeet[.singh]@EnterpriseDB.com
singh.gurjeet@{ gmail | hotmail | yahoo }.com

On 12/31/06, Jim C. Nasby <jim@nasby.net> wrote:
Dunno if you did this or not, I'd suggest sending a patch to -docs.

On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 04:24:39PM +0530, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
> The documentation at
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/interactive/config-setting.html states
> that:
>
> Boolean values may be written as ON, OFF, TRUE, FALSE, YES, NO, 1, 0 (all
> case-insensitive) or any unambiguous prefix of these.
>
> But the following doesn't work:
>
> postgres=# set enable_seqscan = of;
> ERROR:  parameter "enable_seqscan" requires a Boolean value
> postgres=#
>
> 'of' is an unambiguous prefix of OFF, but it clearly doesn't work. Is it the
> documentation that needs fix or is it the code?
>
> I tried the following too:
>
> set enable_seqscan = "of"; -- doesn't work
> set enable_seqscan = "off"; -- works
>
> BTW, I tried TR, TRU, FA, FAL, FALS, YE. They all work fine.
>
> Best regards,
>
> --
> gurjeet[.singh]@EnterpriseDB.com
> singh.gurjeet@{ gmail | hotmail | yahoo }.com

--
Jim Nasby                                            jim@nasby.net
EnterpriseDB      http://enterprisedb.com      512.569.9461 (cell)

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: TODO: GNU TLS
Next
From: "Andrew Dunstan"
Date:
Subject: Re: Doc bug