Re: BUG #17946: LC_MONETARY & DO LANGUAGE plperl - BUG - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joe Conway
Subject Re: BUG #17946: LC_MONETARY & DO LANGUAGE plperl - BUG
Date
Msg-id 65667857-d2a8-e357-6ba6-45d98a363f61@joeconway.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #17946: LC_MONETARY & DO LANGUAGE plperl - BUG  ("Tristan Partin" <tristan@neon.tech>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 7/3/23 12:25, Tristan Partin wrote:
> On Sat Jun 24, 2023 at 8:09 AM CDT, Joe Conway wrote:
>> Although I have not looked yet, presumably we could have similar 
>> problems with plpython. I would like to get agreement on this approach 
>> against plperl before diving into that though.
>>
>> Thoughts?
> 
> I don't see anything immediately wrong with this. I think doing a
> similar thing for plpython would make sense. Might make sense to CC any
> other pl* maintainers too.

In our tree there are only plperl and plpython to worry about.

"other pl* maintainers" is a fuzzy concept since other pl's are 
scattered far and wide.

I think it is reasonable to expect such maintainers to be paying 
attention to hackers and pick up on it themselves (I say that as a pl 
maintainer myself -- plr)

-- 
Joe Conway
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #17946: LC_MONETARY & DO LANGUAGE plperl - BUG
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: explain analyze rows=%.0f