Re: BUG #17946: LC_MONETARY & DO LANGUAGE plperl - BUG - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tristan Partin
Subject Re: BUG #17946: LC_MONETARY & DO LANGUAGE plperl - BUG
Date
Msg-id CTSOE3SS70RW.YE7NMLMQSQSO@gonk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #17946: LC_MONETARY & DO LANGUAGE plperl - BUG  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Responses Re: BUG #17946: LC_MONETARY & DO LANGUAGE plperl - BUG
Re: BUG #17946: LC_MONETARY & DO LANGUAGE plperl - BUG
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat Jun 24, 2023 at 8:09 AM CDT, Joe Conway wrote:
> Although I have not looked yet, presumably we could have similar
> problems with plpython. I would like to get agreement on this approach
> against plperl before diving into that though.
>
> Thoughts?

I don't see anything immediately wrong with this. I think doing a
similar thing for plpython would make sense. Might make sense to CC any
other pl* maintainers too.

--
Tristan Partin
Neon (https://neon.tech)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: %T Prompt parameter for psql for current time (like Oracle has)
Next
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #17946: LC_MONETARY & DO LANGUAGE plperl - BUG