Re: psql questions: SQL, progname, copyright dates - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: psql questions: SQL, progname, copyright dates
Date
Msg-id 6403.1094746120@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: psql questions: SQL, progname, copyright dates  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: psql questions: SQL, progname, copyright dates  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I talked to Greg via chat and it looks like '&' is the best choice for
> adding system object display:

>     \d& shows system stuff

Yech, that's awful.  It looks ugly and it commandeers a punctuation
symbol that we might wish to use for something else someday.

I thought the "S" suggestion was much better than this.

Personally I am not unhappy with the existing behavior, because (unlike
Greg I guess) I use \df and \do to look at system definitions all the
time.  However I'm willing to accept \dfS on the grounds of symmetry
with the behavior for tables.  I don't really want to put up with a less
convenient behavior *and* a gratuitously different syntax.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: psql questions: SQL, progname, copyright dates
Next
From: Hervé Piedvache
Date:
Subject: pg_autovacuum and v8.0