Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > I talked to Greg via chat and it looks like '&' is the best choice for
> > adding system object display:
>
> > \d& shows system stuff
>
> Yech, that's awful. It looks ugly and it commandeers a punctuation
> symbol that we might wish to use for something else someday.
>
> I thought the "S" suggestion was much better than this.
My problem is that it uses a letter as a modifier, while all other
letters are object specifications. '+' is a modifier. We need another
modifier that isn't a letter. No one knew \dtS worked because 'S'
doesn't look like a modifier.
> Personally I am not unhappy with the existing behavior, because (unlike
> Greg I guess) I use \df and \do to look at system definitions all the
> time. However I'm willing to accept \dfS on the grounds of symmetry
> with the behavior for tables. I don't really want to put up with a less
> convenient behavior *and* a gratuitously different syntax.
I am also happy with the existing behavior. Another idea is to add a
modifier that supresses system functions, etc.
I think adding 'S' to \df confuses more than it helps.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
