Re: [HACKERS] New partitioning - some feedback - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mark Kirkwood
Subject Re: [HACKERS] New partitioning - some feedback
Date
Msg-id 609ab8e7-01c2-4b35-6824-7201b2bae434@catalyst.net.nz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] New partitioning - some feedback  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] New partitioning - some feedback
List pgsql-hackers
On 07/07/17 13:29, Amit Langote wrote:

>
> Someone complained about this awhile back [1].  And then it came up again
> [2], where Noah appeared to take a stance that partitions should be
> visible in views / output of commands that list "tables".
>
> Although I too tend to prefer not filling up the \d output space by
> listing partitions (pg_class.relispartition = true relations), there
> wasn't perhaps enough push for creating a patch for that.  If some
> committer is willing to consider such a patch, I can make one.
>


Yeah, me too (clearly). However if the consensus is that all these 
partition tables *must* be shown in \d output, then I'd be happy if they 
were identified as such rather than just 'table' (e.g 'partition table').

regards

Mark



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Error while copying a large file in pg_rewind
Next
From: "K S, Sandhya (Nokia - IN/Bangalore)"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Postgres process invoking exit resulting in sh-QUITcore