Re: Serializable implementation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Serializable implementation
Date
Msg-id 603c8f071001080700n21272497h6a4e3397a4e34c75@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Serializable implementation  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
Responses Re: Serializable implementation  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Kevin Grittner
<Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote:
> Opinions?

I think anything you decide about how to invoke the different
isolation levels will be easy to change later to meet whatever the
consensus of the community is at that time.  I wouldn't spend any time
or energy on it now.  For purposes of your prototype patch, using
REPEATABLE READ for the current serializable and SERIALIZABLE for the
new behavior will be plenty good enough.

...Robert


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking
Next
From: Tim Bunce
Date:
Subject: Feature patch 1 for plperl [PATCH]