Re: Serializable implementation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: Serializable implementation
Date
Msg-id 4B475654020000250002E0F3@gw.wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Serializable implementation  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think anything you decide about how to invoke the different
> isolation levels will be easy to change later to meet whatever the
> consensus of the community is at that time.  I wouldn't spend any
> time or energy on it now.  For purposes of your prototype patch,
> using REPEATABLE READ for the current serializable and
> SERIALIZABLE for the new behavior will be plenty good enough.

I think the attached (so far noop) patch covers that.  This is "for
the record" for those interested; I'm not looking for review per se,
or commit.

-Kevin

P.S.  The git hints worked like a charm, and saved much flailing.

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: Listen / Notify - what to do when the queue is full
Next
From: Andreas Joseph Krogh
Date:
Subject: NOT NULL violation and error-message