Re: [OFF-TOPIC] - Known maximum size of the - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Don Vaillancourt
Subject Re: [OFF-TOPIC] - Known maximum size of the
Date
Msg-id 6.1.0.6.0.20040506094353.01b363c8@localhost
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [OFF-TOPIC] - Known maximum size of the PostgreSQL  (Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>)
Responses Re: [OFF-TOPIC] - Known maximum size of the
List pgsql-performance

Here's a question a little off-topic.

What would a 32TB database hardware configuration look like.  I'm assuming 200GB hard-drives which would total 160 of them.  Double that if you mirror them.

Am I correct?

At 04:13 AM 06/05/2004, you wrote:
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
What's the case of bigger database PostgreSQL (so greate and amount of
registers) that they know???

Didn't someone say that RedSheriff had a 10TB postgres database or something?

From http://www.redsheriff.com/us/news/news_4_201.html

"According to the company, RedSheriff processes 10 billion records a month and the total amount of data managed is more than 32TB. Griffin said PostgreSQL has been in production for 12 months with not a single database fault in that time �The stability of the database can not be questioned. Needless to say, we are extremely happy."

I think it's safe to assume this is not on a spare Dell 600SC though.

--
  Richard Huxton
  Archonet Ltd

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Don Vaillancourt
Director of Software Development

WEB IMPACT INC.
416-815-2000 ext. 245
email: donv@webimpact.com
web:
http://www.webimpact.com



This email message is intended only for the addressee(s) 
and contains information that may be confidential and/or 
copyright.  If you are not the intended recipient please 
notify the sender by reply email and immediately delete 
this email. Use, disclosure or reproduction of this email 
by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly 
prohibited. No representation is made that this email or 
any attachments are free of viruses. Virus scanning is 
recommended and is the responsibility of the recipient.









pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Grega Bremec
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] MySQL vs PG TPC-H benchmarks
Next
From: Litao Wu
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_stat