> On Jan 15, 2019, at 2:37 AM, Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> wrote:
>
> Andres> strtod()'s job ought to computationally be significantly easier
> Andres> than the other way round, no? And if there's buggy strtod()
> Andres> implementations out there, why would they be guaranteed to do
> Andres> the correct thing with our current output, but not with ryu's?
>
> Funny thing: I've been devoting considerable effort to testing this, and
> the one failure mode I've found is very interesting; it's not a problem
> with strtod(), in fact it's a bug in our float4in caused by _misuse_ of
> strtod().
Hi,
I'm trying to reproduce the results by calling float4in in my test code. But I
have some difficulties linking the code:
testfloat4.c:(.text+0x34): undefined reference to `float4in'
testfloat4.c:(.text+0x3c): undefined reference to `DirectFunctionCall1Coll'
I tried offering float.o to the linker in addition to my test program. I also
tried to link all the objects (*.o). But the errors still exist. I attached my
changes as a patch.
I wonder if creating separated test programs is a good way of testing the code,
and I'm interested in learning what I missed.
Thank you.
